Saint Simonian Notion of Share and Share Alike

It is a fundamental principle of their Socialist doctrine, which dictates that the members should be compensated not based on equal portions, but "according to their capacity, and to each capacity according to its works." Each individual share is proportional to their productive contribution to society. 

There is a key departure from the traditional view of share and share alike, which advocates a strictly equal division among beneficiaries. Saint Simonian aimed to replace the exploitation of man by man with an organised system based on social utility and a hierarchy of merit, where "idlers" (such as aristocracy living on inherited wealth)
Key aspects of Saint-Simonian notion include:

• Abolition of inheritance: To ensure that an individual's social position was based on their own merit and work, Saint Simonians advocated for the abolition of the right of inheritance. Upon death a person's property would fall to the state. 

• Merit based hierarchy: Society would be managed by an economic administration led by most capable industrial leaders and scientists. These leaders would be responsible for classifying workers and allocating them to the most suitable positions, rewarding them based on their services and ability. 

• Social justice: The ultimate goal of this system was to achieve the rapid improvement possible of the poorest classes," by organising society in a way that maximized social utility and eliminated poverty and idleness. 

• The system implied a planned economy where production and distribution were organised to meet the needs of the society, rather than being determined solely by market forces. It is more or less equivalent of the idea of Utopian Socialism. 

The proponent of the idea was Claude Henri de Rouvroy Comte de Saint-Simon, better known as Henry de Simon. He was a younger relative of the famous memoirist, Duc de Saint Simon. Working class according to him included all people engaged in productive work that contributed to society such as merchants, managers and scientists. He perceived aristocracy an idling class that contribute nothing to the society. He condemned any intrusion of state into the economy beyond ensuring productive working condition and reducing the idleness in society. Critics have described his ideas as authoritarian or totalitarian. Later, his ideas influenced Utopian Socialism. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thousand & One Nights: 72nd Night contd.The Story of Two Viziers

Thousand & One Nights: 70th Night

Thousand & One Nights: 72nd Night